Lying Liberals

Sorry for the long delay in posting. Lots to do.
Anyway, a lot has happened since the election. The liberals have blamed Christianity for Bush's victory, and thus Christians are the new targets. Christmas was being "bah-humbugged" throughout the country in retaliation, or was it? No doubt liberals are angry at the Christians, not the least because of Bush's victory, but you must remember, liberals have hated Christianity long before this election, and even long before Bush came to office in 2000! Christianity is associated with right-wing values, and therefore must be bad! Nevermind the fact that there are many democrats that are Christian, and even moderate liberals (oxymoron? you decide) are Christian as well. Attacking a religion in the name of "tollerance" for other religions is a very dangerous path the liberals have for some reason chosen. But Christians know, for it's told in the Bible, they will be persecuted, so many Christians just keep our heads high, and live our lives the way we think we should. The other issue I wanted to bring up is the terrible earthquake and tsunami. Undoubtedly, this was a horrific event that swiped several countries and regions. But with tragedy comes hatred, and with hatred, comes stupidity. Many people are angry with the United States for being so called "stingy". Nevermind the fact we sent $350 million in aid already, far more than any other country. We're greedy of course, don't you know that? Now, I want us to do a little brainstorming. Let's pretend that the earthquake actually happened somewhere else, and the tsunami struck our West Coast. Let's say every major city from San Diego to Seattle has been oblitterated by the wave, and hundreds of thousands, even millions of Americans lie dead in the streets. Think long and hard when I ask the next question...do you think other countries would come to our aid, besides Australia and Britain? I challenge you on that. I doubt very many European nations would help, and you can forget about the types of nations we are helping right now. No, we'd be more or less alone on this one, as we always are. You don't see relief concerts in England to help the "victims of tornadoes" in the Central US do you? What about charity drives for the victims of the Florida hurricanes? I doubt Parisian television stations would even yawn at the idea. The rest of the world hates the US, and why? Because we're better than they are, we're harder working, more industrious, more powerful, and we have more to show from our successes, and on top of that, we're still more generous. Europeans hate hard working, generous, happy people. They're their polar opposites.

It's 11:54 PM CST, and Bush has 266 electoral votes. Bush will win!!! THANK YOU AMERICA! You showed terror, liberals, and the rest of the world, no one, BUT NO ONE messes with the USA!!! GOD BLESS THE USA! Thank you Lord for giving us a leader who will protect us.

With less than 24 hours to go until official Election Day, I urge you once again to vote for George W. Bush. President Bush has weathered more hardships, seen us through worse times, and comforted us in ways that few presidents ever will. His strength, conviction, humanity, and courage awe me every day. I likely would not have the same strength that our President has, were I faced with the tough decisions he has. George W. Bush comforted the grieving relatives of the September 11th Attacks, and grieved with them. He grieved with the families who lost loved ones in combat. No president ever wants to send our troops in harms way, but George W. Bush realized that he would rather take the fight to the enemy, instead of the enemy taking the fight to us. The terrorists struck us first, and it was a cheap shot. We struck back, and it has been a KO hit. Bush weathered through a tough economy that he inherited from the former president. Today, unemployment is at 5.4%, lower than the average rate of unemployment during Clinton's years. More Americans, and especially minorities own their own homes than ever before. People in this country are optomistic. And the optimism doesn't just end in the borders of the US. 50 million people in Iraq and Afghanistan are now grasping the sweet fruits of liberty. They can taste the succulent flavors of freedom and prosperity, and know that they are getting closer to it every day. These people would still be living in misery in the rape and torture rooms of Saddam and his sons, or the oppressive and brutal Taliban. I know with only one day left, it would be hard to change anyone's mind with a simple web log, but take this with you in the polling booth tomorrow. George W. Bush is a compassionate, freedom loving, God fearing, decent individual. Unlike his candidate, who says what he needs to say to win votes, George W. Bush believes in what he says. We need four more years of George W. Bush. Pray for Mr. Bush, pray for our countries, pray that the world will be free from tyranny, and prosper in a light so bright, it blinds evil. God Bless America, and God Bless George W. Bush.

Well last night was a real treat. Bush tore into John Kerry's record and remarks, leaving Kerry confused and wounded. Good. Senator Floppenstein made idiotic statements as usual, accusing Bush of receiving $84 for a timber company he owns. Bush's classic response: "I own a timber company???" (Here's the actual quote from www.debates.org)
"And you know why he gets that count? The president got $84 from a timber company that owns, and he's counted as a small business. Dick Cheney's counted as a small business. That's how they do things. That's just not right." http://www.debates.org/pages/trans2004c.html
Anyway, Kerry looked particularly poor on issues such as abortion. He basically gave a big middle finger to the Catholic faith saying he doesn't care about his faith and sees abortion as necessary. He even seemed to say abortion prevents AIDS. Strange, no? If it's mannerisms and looks that matter, Bush was right on. He was sharp, aggressive, funny, and intellectually strong. Bush argued that the tax cut roll back that Kerry plans for those making over $200,000 a year would not just hurt those people with incomes at that level, but also self proprietorships, in other words, entrepreneurs. So, Kerry would in effect be choking off one of the largest sectors of the business world, because many people that own their own business file the taxes as their own income, and if the business generated $200,000 in a given year, Kerry's plan would be very difficult for a small business to succeed. I want to go on a bit of a tangent here. Kerry still believes we went into Iraq unilatterally. I offer this website to counter that. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraq_orbat_coalition.htm This site shows countries from as large as the UK, Poland, and Australia, to the smaller, yet no less signficant contributions from countries like Tonga, or Lithuania (I come from a Lithuanian family so I took it rather personally.) When he calls our allies the coerced and bribed, doesn't that send a lot of mixed messages? To our allies, it shows he cares nothing for them. To potential allies, it shows Kerry marginalizes our friends. To the Americans, it shows he is uneducated about foreign policy, and to the enemies...it shows that Kerry is a soft leader, willing to appease their demands. Kerry has shown that he can't take pressure, he flip flops when it becomes convenient, and that he has no respect for the brave soldiers of our allies already on the ground. France and Germany say they won't send troops regardless who is president, so I wonder who these allies may be? Either way, George W. Bush "Bushwacked" Kerry last night, and it was a beautiful thing!

And the winner is...Dick Cheney! Although you won't hear the liberal media proclaim it as such. The general consensus from most media sources is that it was a tie. Well, if mannerisms were so important in a debate like they were in the presidential debate, I have a few observations. Senator Edwards was extraordinarily rude, arrogant, fidgety and aloof throughout the debates. Examples: He blinked an enormously high amount of times, he held his coffee mug in an odd way when he was nervous, and he was quick to respond to the allegations, in much the same way as Bush did against Kerry. Worse yet was when Edwards brought up Cheney's lesbian daughter. It was not very tasteful to say the least. I also found it rather amusing that Edwards can't follow simple rules. The PBS moderator specifically asked that the candidates describe themselves without mentioning their running mate, and Edwards couldn't manage to describe himself without mentioning Senator Kerry. If the freshman senator cannot follow simple debate rules, how can America assume he understands infinitely more complex issues such as global terrorism? As for substance, I saw little more than rehashing of the Kerry campaign from Edwards, while Cheney defended the Bush administration with facts and examples. Cheney also scored on his witty attacks on the ever unfolding records of Kerry and Edwards. Cheney said that Edwards' record was not very distinguished, and he's right. Cheney also called Edwards "Senator Gone", how profetic.

Tonight John Edwards challenges Dick Cheney during a debate airing at 9:00 PM EST. While I've focused most of my criticism towards John Kerry, John Edwards is of a worthy note too. The freshman senator from North Carolina would likely not win reelection as senator in his state, and for good reason. (The following information was gathered from the excellent site http://www.doctorsagainstedwards.com/#mission Doctors Against Edwards.) In North Carolina, critical medical devices such as brain shunts and implanted defibrilators have become harder to obtain due to tort litigation. The great trial lawyer John Edwards made himself extraordinarily rich not by marrying into Big Ketchup, but by suing doctors for sometimes unavoidable problems such as Cerebal Palsy. Gynecologists/Obstetricians in the state of North Carolina are hurting because of Edwards lawsuits. Doctors against Edwards estimates the average American pays between $400-800 per year just on distributing the losses caused by out of control tort lawyers. Worse yet, nuero and cardiac surgeons are more scarce in the state due to fears of litigation. (Appreciation to Doctors Against Edwards for their facts.)
And where did these profits from suing doctors go? Why to a 6,672 square foot mansion, and to his own bank account. And he was late filing his income taxes by four months this year. (Liberals love to raise taxes but seem to have a hard time paying them themselves.) How much is Edwards worth? Between $12-30M.http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/955538/posts John Edwards is in touch with the common folks. He's a real people's man. Right. I won't expect anything with the debates, since I was expecting Bush to trounce Kerry, but I sure am hoping that Cheney dissects the little weasel Edwards.

They're calling it "letter gate". According to a Drudge report, and after watching the video of this and making my own conclusions, I've concluded that Kerry did indeed pull out some sort of piece of paper at the beginning of the debate last Thursday. Whether it was a cheat sheet or any piece of paper, it was against the agreed to rules. This shows the integrity of Kerry, and hopefully it's the last nail in this liar's coffin. I recommend you watch the video yourself. And to think, Kerry got a boost out of the polls from the debate? I wonder how long that will last. Here's the Drudge link. http://www.drudgereport.com/dnc57.htm